Johnny Depp scores win as $50 million lawsuit against ex-wife proceeds
Fairfax, Virginia - A Virginia judge has granted Johnny Depp permission to proceed with his $50-million libel lawsuit against Amber Heard, marking a major legal victory in the actor's ongoing battle with his ex-wife.
The Pirates of the Caribbean star is suing Heard over a 2018 Washington Post op-ed in which she opened up about being a survivor of domestic violence.
While she never specifically named Depp, the Aquaman actress did accuse him of abuse back when they split in 2016.
"I became a public figure representing domestic abuse, and I felt the full force of our culture's wrath for women who speak out," she wrote in the piece.
Fairfax County Chief Judge Penney Azcarate on Tuesday rejected Heard's motion to dismiss the case – her third bid to have it tossed since Depp filed the lawsuit back in March 2019.
The 35-year-old had argued the Virginia court should recognize a previous ruling in a libel lawsuit Depp filed against the publisher of The Sun.
His subsequent appeal of the suit was rejected, as he reopened the case a third time.
"Mr. Depp is most gratified by the Court's decision," the actor's lawyer Ben Chew of the DC office of Brown Rudnick told Deadline.
The case is scheduled for trial on April 11, 2022, in Fairfax County.
Judge rules that statements made by Heard and The Sun are "inherently different"
In November 2020, a London judge concluded that the tabloid's 2018 article labeling Depp a "wife beater" was not libelous and that "the great majority" of Heard's accusations of abuse "could be proved to the civil standard."
Heard said the ruling should also hold sway on the proceedings in the US, given both lawsuits center on her claims the actor is an abuser.
Azcarate disagreed however, ruling that while Heard's op-ed and The Sun's article may be similar, the statements made by the tabloid and Heard were "inherently different."
"[Heard] argues she was in privity with The Sun because they both had the same interest in the case. However, for privity to exist, [Heard's] interest in the case must be so identical with The Sun's interest such that The Sun's representation of its interest is also a representation of [Heard's] legal right," Azcarate explained.
"The Sun's interests were based on whether the statements the newspaper published were false. [Heard's] interests relate to whether the statements she published were false."
The judge also noted that Heard was not a named party in Depp's suit against the British tabloid because her op-ed had not yet been published.
The ruling is seen as a major win for Depp and his fans, who have kept the hashtag #JusticeforJohnnyDepp trending amid his proclaimed boycott from Hollywood.
Cover photo: Collage: IMAGO / i Images & ZUMA Wire